The Modi government finally spoke of withdrawing three bills related to farmers after one year. Modi ji came on TV in the morning and he talked about taking back the laws which since then millions of farmers were protesting on the borders of Delhi. Farmers have been protesting on the streets away from their homes for more than a year to withdraw the bills. It claimed the lives of more than three farmers, who spent more than a year of their lives on the streets away from home and their families. Will be taken back However, this was one of the demands of the farmers. Their protest is not over yet but the sit-in movement started with the enactment of laws. By the way, it seems that the government was thinking about how long this sit-in would last. Exhausted, they will return home in a couple of months. But on the one hand, Shaheen Bagh set an example by holding sit-ins for more than three months. The sit-in was also called off to prevent coronary heart disease, otherwise it would have continued. The farmers had come after six months of preparation and had run it for more than a year with very good planning. This protest of the farmers had increased so much that the government was upset. The farmers not only stopped themselves from sitting on the streets of Delhi but also traveled all over the country and made efforts like Panchayats, Rail Roko, Truck Rally. Protests were still going on and elections were coming soon in Uttar Pradesh and Punjab when Modiji suddenly appeared on TV as usual and the three farmers talked about withdrawing the bill. The famous farmer Nita Rakesh Tikit was asked if the peasant movement would end now. He replied that at first he did not trust the verbal promises. They also want MSP and a decision on martyred farmers and imprisoned farmers. On the other hand, the statement made by Modi ji while withdrawing the decision is negative in itself. “Despite doing so much penance, we are now taking it back when some farmers could not understand its benefits and they have apologized to the people and not to the farmers,” he said. Manu is saying that I am withdrawing the law which was brought for the benefit of the people and the farmers for some reason. The question is that in your opinion these laws were better for the farmers and only a few were not obeying then why the majority was harmed because of a few. Now the elections in Uttar Pradesh and Punjab are not big enough for Modi’s denial to bow down to the farmers. For over a year now, the media has been trying to explain the benefits of this bill to the farmers There were various abuses against the farmers. Attempts were made to demonize the farmers ‘protest as the government and state media described the farmers’ protest as Khalistani, Pakistani, Bharmat and Opposition Motivated. Now all of a sudden they must have been shocked internally. You may be thinking that at least Modiji should have been told before doing so. So that he could have made some preparations. A media anchor who used to make teacher type videos to prove the decisions of Modi government right and the opposition wrong has gone completely stunned. I should have told you. So that he could have made some preparations. A media anchor who used to make teacher type videos to prove the decisions of Modi government right and the opposition wrong has gone completely stunned. I should have told you. So that he could have made some preparations. A media anchor who used to make teacher type videos to prove the decisions of Modi government right and the opposition wrong has gone completely stunned.
By the way, the media should be stopped from being one-sided like this, otherwise such disrespect is now becoming a part of their career. On the other hand, the position of media is seen by the present government. We had earlier said in our videos that the government and state media will not only be against Muslims but will attack anyone who stands against the government. And since all the policies are being made in favor of those who sit on the throne, not only the Muslims will be harmed but also the common man and India.
It remains to be seen whether this peasant protest of today will enter the era in the Modi government, will it be the same as the Anna Andolan and Thatcher Moment?
According to experts, the Modi government’s response will basically determine where the political economy of India will go in the coming years, but also where the electoral politics will go. Thatcher Moment is known as Margaret Thatcher, which means that when someone brings a big and risky push for reform that threatens the Establishment Structure, the storm rises. This is what Margaret Thatcher faced on the occasion of the Radical Shift of her economic rights. Margaret got involved in this conflict, won it and then she was called Iron Lady. If she had come under pressure, perhaps no one in the world would have remembered Margaret today.
Anna Moment will be easier for us to understand. It is also more recent. This also happened in Delhi. In stark contrast to Thatcher, in which the government had crushed the Unions, the Manmohan Singh government of India had called a special Parliament session and surrendered before Anna Hazare and in a way accepted all the charges of corruption. ۔ On the one hand, Anna returned to her place in a triumphant manner and on the other hand, the Manmohan Singh government was ready to go. Anna won, but not because she won the Lokpal. That’s because their managers didn’t want to get it. Some people even say that Anna did not want this. Their mission was to destroy UPA-2. And they succeeded. By the way, the Modi government in the last two years of its rule also took big decisions and fought them hard and did not let the voices of the people win. This We can’t just take the anti CAA moment because it was removed not because of the government but because of Corona. However, the Modi government had used this protest to spread hatred in the country. We saw that just as the government discredited the Shaheen Bagh Moment in different ways, so did the peasant movement. Like a failed attempt to connect farmers with Khalistanis. This made the farmers even angrier. This was the same mistake that the Congress government made with Anna Hazare. The Congress had said that Anna Hazare was immersed in corruption from head to toe. Remember the principle of marketing that nothing fails more spectacularly than an obvious lie. The anti-CAA protests included Muslims and a few leftists who were easy to disperse under the current circumstances. Because you have already heated up the atmosphere of hatred. The use of force would also work on them. We have seen that Modi government did not even invite the people of Shaheen Bagh Moment to speak. While he did not treat the farmers. Apart from the other conditions that were going on, such as not giving up the Chinese occupation of Ladakh, the long-term deterioration of the country’s economy, the storm of inflation had also disturbed the Modi government. Modiji is trying to present himself as a reformer but nothing is happening. Denominations, losses of GST are not going away, government assets are being sold and inflation is coming to the fore even after the media has covered it up. Due to all these, Modiji wanted to take advantage of the Corona epidemic by taking it as booty. But between all of them came farm laws and the farmers suffocated. He not only sat in his seat but also launched a nationwide campaign against the BJP.
We gave the example of Margaret Thatcher. The story with Margaret was a little different. Not all the problems that Modiji had created were related to Margaret. Here Modiji had taken a decision which was going to affect 60% of the population of our country. Anna Moment seems closer. Like India Against Corruption, Kisan Andolan also placed itself in a non-political place and did not allow any political leader to come on its stage. Farmers also used social media like Anna Moment. And there was a lot of people in the general public with the farmers.
By the way, there was some difference between the two. In the UPA, Manmohan G’s self was not fully functioning. Nobody cares about Modi here. At the same time, there is no need for anyone else in the government with as many MPs as there are, the Congress did not have such a large majority there. On the other hand, the way the farmers were running their momentum was bound to win the sympathy of the people. The way farmers were simply sitting on the streets, cooking anchors and feeding them all, coping with difficult seasons, not accepting the invitation of the government for food at meetings with the government and sitting on the ground eating their food. Did eat These were not all issues with Thatcher and the Manmohan Singh government did not have such a facility. But now that Modiji has spoken about withdrawing the form bliss, the expert had already said that it is possible that the government would talk about withdrawing the bliss, then send it to the select committee and send it to the farmers. Get time by misleading. But at the same time, experts say that if the Modi government adopts the path adopted by the Manmohan Singh government, it would be a very wrong decision. It remains to be seen whether these blues will actually return completely or whether it is a ploy. Because the big businessmen have invested money because of these bills. And like the Land Reform Bill, will it now be eroded by the state instead of the Center?
